Marco Rubio accuses Zelenskyy of lying about US conditions for Ukraine
Secretary of State Marco Rubio accused Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of lying regarding US demands for Ukraine to cede the eastern Donbas region to Russia.
Marco Rubio’s comments suggest a potential redirection of military assistance from Ukraine to Iran, indicating significant changes in US foreign policy priorities.
“That’s a lie,” Rubio said regarding Zelenskyy’s remarks, emphasising that security guarantees would not commence without a conclusion to the conflict.
Key developments
Secretary of State Marco Rubio accused Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of lying regarding US conditions on Ukraine’s territorial concessions for security guarantees, following Zelenskyy’s remarks about eastern Donbas.
Rubio stated that security guarantees would be contingent on the end of the war and not tied to any territorial surrender, branding Zelenskyy’s comments as untrue.
Rubio also indicated that the US may redirect military aid from Ukraine to support operations against Iran, highlighting a shift in priorities without currently diverting any assistance.
Rubio slams Zelenskyy’s Donbas comments and says US may divert Ukraine arms to Iran
Published on
Secretary of State Marco Rubio accused Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of lying over US demands on Friday and voiced an openness to divert weapons earmarked for Kyiv to support the war on Iran.
Zelenskyy had said in an interview that the United States was pressing Ukraine to cede the eastern Donbas region to Russia before finalising any post-war security guarantees.
“That’s a lie,” Rubio told reporters when asked about Zelenskyy’s remarks.
“I saw him say that and it’s unfortunate he would say that, because he knows that’s not true,” Rubio said in Paris after talks with the Group of Seven industrialised nations.
“What he was told is the obvious: security guarantees are not going to kick in until there’s an end to a war, because otherwise you’re getting yourself involved in the war,” Rubio said.
“That was not attached to, unless he gives up territory,” Rubio said. “I don’t know why he says these things. It’s not true.”
The attack on Zelenskyy was especially striking coming from Rubio, a former hawkish senator who has largely been seen as more supportive of the Ukrainian cause than some others in President Donald Trump’s circle.
In a scene that went viral in February last year, Rubio sat sullenly in the Oval Office as Trump and Vice President JD Vance berated Zelenskyy, saying he was ungrateful for US assistance.
Recently, Trump has again criticised Zelenskyy, saying that he needs to accept compromises and comparing him unfavourably with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Rubio said that the United States was open to shifting assistance to Ukraine after the United States and Israel attacked Iran.
“Nothing yet has been diverted, but it could,” Rubio said.
“If we need something for America and it’s American, we’re going to keep it for America first.”
Additional sources • AFP
Great article! This really puts things into perspective. I appreciate the thorough research and balanced viewpoint.
Interesting read, though I think there are some points that could have been explored further. Would love to see a follow-up on this topic.
Thanks for sharing this! I had no idea about some of these details. Definitely bookmarking this for future reference.
Well written and informative. The examples provided really help illustrate the main points effectively.
This is exactly what I was looking for! Clear, concise, and very helpful. Keep up the excellent work!