Judge issues temporary block on Justice Department's $1.7 billion fund

A federal judge has temporarily halted the Justice Department's implementation of the $1.7 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund, pending consideration of a lawsuit challenging its legality. U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema's order prevents any disbursement of funds amid concerns over its establishment and potential payouts.

WTX News

4 min read
0

/

Judge issues temporary block on Justice Department's $1.7 billion fund

Get you up to speed: Judge temporarily blocks Justice Dept. work on $1.7+ billion “anti-weaponization” fund

A federal judge has temporarily blocked the Justice Department from proceeding with the new $1.7 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund following a lawsuit filed by plaintiffs, including Andrew Floyd and Jonathan Caravello. U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema’s order prevents any further actions related to the fund to ensure no funds are disbursed while the legality of the programme is reviewed.

A federal judge has issued a temporary hold on the Justice Department’s $1.7 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund while reviewing a lawsuit challenging its legality. The Justice Department has not disclosed the names of the five members designated to oversee payouts from the fund.

A federal judge has temporarily blocked the Justice Department from proceeding with the $1.7+ billion Anti-Weaponization Fund until the legality of the programme can be fully reviewed, citing concerns over its potential use of taxpayer funds. Skye Perryman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward, stated that the court’s decision is a “victory for transparency” and expressed anticipation for the case’s next stages.

What remains unclear — The Justice Department has not disclosed the identities of the five commission members who will approve claims from the Anti-Weaponization Fund.

Judge issues temporary block on Justice Department’s $1.7 billion fund

Washington — A federal judge temporarily blocked the Justice Department from moving forward with work on the new $1.7+ billion Anti-Weaponization Fund, including making any payouts.

U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema said in a brief order dated Thursday that the temporary hold allows her time to consider whether to grant longer-term relief sought by a group of plaintiffs who are challenging the new fund, which was announced by the Justice Department earlier this month.

Brinkema’s order prevents the Justice Department from “taking any further action pursuant to the creation or operation” of the program “to ensure that no funds are irreversibly disbursed” from it. It covers the transfer of money to the fund, consideration of any claims submitted and disbursement of any payments.

Andrew Floyd, a former federal prosecutor who investigated and prosecuted people involved in the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol, and Jonathan Caravello, a California professor who was arrested while protesting an immigration raid, as well as nonprofits, filed their lawsuit last week arguing that the fund is unlawful.

They argued that the fund is a “collusive agreement” between President Trump and his administration that “has no congressional authorization, no basis in law, and no accountability.”

In response to Brinkema’s order, Skye Perryman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward, which is representing the plaintiffs, said the court “recognized the urgent need to prevent taxpayer dollars from being distributed through a secretive and unprecedented political compensation scheme before the legality of that program can be fully reviewed by the court.”

“This is a victory for transparency, the rule of law, and the American people,” she said in a statement. “No administration has the authority to spend public money through a political rewards program that Congress never authorized. We look forward to the next stages in this case.” 

The Anti-Weaponization Fund was created by the Justice Department as part of a settlement of Mr. Trump’s civil lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service over the leak of his tax returns by a former government contractor.

The Justice Department said the program aims to “provide a systematic process to hear and redress claims of others who suffered weaponization and lawfare.” A five-member board would determine payouts from the $1.7 billion pot.

But the Trump administration has come under pressure over the fund, including from Republicans on Capitol Hill, due to concerns that people involved in the Jan. 6 attack would seek and receive payments. Mr. Trump granted clemency to more than 1,500 people who were convicted of crimes stemming from the Capitol assault and has suggested they were treated unfairly.

There have not yet been any official announcements by the Justice Department naming the five commission members who would approve claims and set the criteria for who would be entitled to a cut of the fund.

The lawsuit is one of many filed in recent days to stop the fund’s implementation. Two other law enforcement officers who clashed with rioters on Jan. 6 sued to block the fund, as have government oversight and accountability groups. 

Legal experts, however, are skeptical that the lawsuits could obtain permanent relief and dismantle the fund.

Responses

    Sarah Mitchell·

    Great article! This really puts things into perspective. I appreciate the thorough research and balanced viewpoint.

    James Anderson·

    Interesting read, though I think there are some points that could have been explored further. Would love to see a follow-up on this topic.

    Emma Thompson·

    Thanks for sharing this! I had no idea about some of these details. Definitely bookmarking this for future reference.

    Michael Chen·

    Well written and informative. The examples provided really help illustrate the main points effectively.

    Olivia Rodriguez·

    This is exactly what I was looking for! Clear, concise, and very helpful. Keep up the excellent work!

Stay Updated

Get the latest posts delivered right to your inbox.

No spam, unsubscribe at any time.