European Parliament estimates digital levy could raise €25bn annually
The European Parliament‘s proposed digital levy could raise up to €25.2 billion annually, significantly surpassing the European Commission‘s initial estimate.
The proposed digital levy could generate up to €25.2bn annually, significantly exceeding the European Commission‘s initial assessments, highlighting its potential to provide substantial funding for the EU’s budgetary needs.
“We need new own resources to cover the repayment of the joint debt and to fund new priorities in the EU budget,” said MEP Danuše Nerudová.
Exclusive: EU-wide digital levy might generate up to €25bn annually for next budget
Published on
A digital levy proposed by the European Parliament to help fund the EU’s next long-term budget could raise up to €25bn a year, according to leading MEP Danuše Nerudová.
The new estimates put the yield of the Parliament’s proposed EU-level taxes far above what the European Commission originally calculated.
Talks are at a crunch point. EU countries are scrambling to agree the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) by the end of the year, and new “own resources” flowing directly into EU coffers remain a key flashpoint.
“We need new own resources to cover the repayment of the joint debt and to fund new priorities in the EU budget,” Nerudová (Czechia/EPP) told EU News.
She asked Parliament’s services to assess how much the proposed EU-wide taxes on online gambling, digital services and crypto assets could raise. Their findings differ sharply from the Commission’s.
According to the Parliament’s estimates, seen exclusively by EU News, the digital levy could raise up to €25.2bn a year, five times the Commission’s figure.
“The European Parliament is calculating with a much broader tax base than the Commission. The tech space also covers, for example, streaming and data processing services, which the Commission completely omitted,” Nerudová said.
The Parliament’s proposal widens the levy’s scope well beyond advertising and intermediation services and raises the rate from 3% to 5%. The Commission’s estimate was based on existing digital services taxes in France, Spain and Italy.
“This is a very conservative estimate, even though it’s much higher than the Commission’s proposal. But the huge difference is the tax base we are using in our estimates,” Nerudová continued.
Several member states, meanwhile, have expressed scepticism about a digital levy over “geopolitical concerns”, namely the risk that the US government could retaliate with new trade measures.
“These reactions are coming even without the digital levy. We have a lot of tech giants here, running their business all around Europe without paying a fair share. This is the tool to tax those companies, which are not on the same level playing field as the European ones,” Nerudová said.
“This is the right tool to raise money for the EU budget in a sustainable way,” she added.
The Parliament’s estimate for online gambling is more than double the Commission’s, at €3.9bn against €1.9bn. It also puts the yield of a capital gains tax on crypto assets at €3bn, compared with the Commission’s €2.4bn.
The tax on online gambling faces stark resistance from Malta, home to the European headquarters of many online betting operators.
The capital gains tax on crypto assets is generally regarded favourably, but also as very difficult to implement, as it would be easy to circumvent and subject to the volatility of this market.
Asked whether the Commission could implement the taxes in time for the start of the next budget period in 2028, Nerudová said negotiations were already behind schedule.
“The crypto asset tax might be complicated, but a digital levy is quite easy to implement at EU level,” she said.
Great article! This really puts things into perspective. I appreciate the thorough research and balanced viewpoint.
Interesting read, though I think there are some points that could have been explored further. Would love to see a follow-up on this topic.
Thanks for sharing this! I had no idea about some of these details. Definitely bookmarking this for future reference.
Well written and informative. The examples provided really help illustrate the main points effectively.
This is exactly what I was looking for! Clear, concise, and very helpful. Keep up the excellent work!