Trump‘s Ballroom Approved Days After Judge Halts Construction
Final Approval
The National Capital Planning Commission approved Donald Trump’s plan for a 90,000 sq ft ballroom at the White House despite a recent court order to halt construction.
US District Judge Richard Leon issued a preliminary injunction halting construction until independent reviews and congressional approval are secured, emphasizing stewardship of the White House.
Congressional approval and independent reviews are required before construction can resume on the ballroom project, which is currently halted by a judge’s order.
Briefing summary
Donald Trump’s proposal for a ballroom at the White House received final approval from the National Capital Planning Commission, despite a judge’s recent order to halt construction for two weeks.
Commission chairman Will Scharf defended the project, arguing it would eventually be regarded as a national treasure, similar to previous White House additions.
US District Judge Richard Leon emphasized the necessity of preservation reviews and congressional approval before proceeding, stating the President is merely the steward of the historic site.
Full reading: Trump’s ballroom gets approval days after judge orders construction halt | US News
Donald Trump’s plan to build a ballroom at the White House has been given final approval by a key commission – just days after a judge ordered construction to stop.
The National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC), the agency responsible for approving construction on federal property in Washington, approved the plans to build the ballroom in a vote on Thursday.
Commission chairman Will Scharf, a top aide in the Trump administration and the president’s former lawyer, said a judge’s ruling on Tuesday that construction should be halted for two weeks “really does not impact our action here today”.
Mr Trump’s plan to build a 90,000sq ft ballroom on the site of the demolished East Wing will mark the biggest structural change to the White House in more than 70 years if it is completed.
Before the vote, Mr Scharf delivered a defence of the project touching on past additions to the White House that were criticised at the time but have since become beloved.
He spoke of the addition of the north and south porticos and the balcony added by President Harry Truman.
“I believe that, in time, this ballroom will be considered every bit of a national treasure as the other key components of the White House,” Mr Scharf said.
US District Judge Richard Leon granted a preservationist group’s request for a preliminary injunction that temporarily halts the construction project until the plan has undergone independent reviews and obtained congressional approval.
Judge Leon wrote: “The President of the United States is the steward of the White House for future generations of First Families. He is not, however, the owner!”
Read more from US News:
Trump attends Supreme Court hearing on birthright citizenship
Market uncertainty despite Trump attempt to soothe concerns
The commission’s vote, including three members appointed by Mr Trump, had initially been scheduled for March but was pushed to Thursday because so many people signed up to comment on it at the commission’s meeting.
The only no vote was cast by Phil Mendelson, a Democrat who chairs the Council of the District of Columbia, who criticised the design of the ballroom for being too large.
The commission also considered some design changes announced by Mr Trump on Sunday, including removing a large staircase on the building’s south side and adding an uncovered porch on the west side.
The staircase has been criticised as there is no way to enter the ballroom from them under the plans.














Great article! This really puts things into perspective. I appreciate the thorough research and balanced viewpoint.
Interesting read, though I think there are some points that could have been explored further. Would love to see a follow-up on this topic.
Thanks for sharing this! I had no idea about some of these details. Definitely bookmarking this for future reference.
Well written and informative. The examples provided really help illustrate the main points effectively.
This is exactly what I was looking for! Clear, concise, and very helpful. Keep up the excellent work!