Get you up to speed: House to vote on ICE funding, ending months-long impasse
The House is set to vote on a $70 billion bill funding immigration enforcement agencies after the Senate approved it early Friday. House Speaker Mike Johnson expects the legislation to pass, with a procedural vote scheduled for 1:30 p.m. and final passage anticipated after 4:30 p.m.
The House Rules Committee convened on Monday to prepare for a procedural vote, scheduled for 1:30 p.m., with final passage expected post-4:30 p.m. if prior votes are successful. House Speaker Mike Johnson expressed confidence in the bill’s passage, although attendance concerns during primary season pose challenges for GOP leaders.
House Speaker Mike Johnson expects the $70 billion immigration enforcement funding bill to pass in the House, despite acknowledging a tight margin of error due to primary season attendance challenges. Meanwhile, Rep. Kevin Kiley plans to vote against the bill, citing concerns about the “strictly party-line process” and advocating for significant bipartisan reforms to interior immigration enforcement.
What remains unclear — It is uncertain whether House Republicans can secure sufficient votes for the bill despite the Speaker’s expectations.
House set to vote on $70 billion ICE funding bill after Senate approval
Washington — The House is set to vote Tuesday on Republicans’ $70 billion bill funding immigration enforcement agencies through the rest of President Trump’s term after the Senate approved it early Friday following weeks of roadblocks.
Barring any last-minute hiccups among House Republicans, passage would bring an end to the months-long stalemate over funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol.
The House is scheduled to take a procedural vote on the legislation around 1:30 p.m., with final passage expected after 4:30 p.m. if it clears the earlier vote. On Monday afternoon, the House Rules Committee met to tee it up for floor consideration.
House GOP leaders had initially expected to hold a vote late last week on passage, but delayed taking up the measure until this week.
House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, said Monday that he expected the legislation to pass, although he acknowledged that he had a very small margin of error and that attendance during primary season “is a real challenge.”
“We have to fund border enforcement and immigration enforcement, and everybody here knows that, so they’re going to have to put their personal preferences aside to get the job done,” he said.
But at least one member who caucuses with Republicans, Rep. Kevin Kiley, a California independent, said he plans to vote against the bill. Kiley had “very strong concerns” about the “strictly party-line process” and wanted to see “significant bipartisan reforms to interior immigration enforcement.”
House Republicans have been waiting for weeks for their Senate counterparts to send over the legislation. Both chambers had hoped to have the bill on President Trump’s desk by Memorial Day in order to meet his June 1 deadline, but those plans were impeded by the president’s request for $1 billion related to construction of a massive ballroom at the White House and the announcement of a nearly $1.8 billion Justice Department fund to pay people who claim they were politically persecuted.
Rare GOP pushback against the president’s priorities forced Senate Republicans to delay votes until after their Memorial Day recess.
Language for ballroom security funding was ultimately stripped from the legislation and the Justice Department said it would no longer pursue the “anti-weaponization” fund. Though the administration’s assertion about no longer pursuing the fund failed to convince some who were skeptical, a number of amendments to formally bar such payouts were defeated during a marathon session of votes in the Senate that stretched from Thursday morning into the early hours of Friday.
Republicans used the budget reconciliation process to fund immigration-related agencies. The process allows them to pass some fiscal legislation by a simple majority in the Senate, bypassing the need for any Democratic votes to overcome the 60-vote filibuster threshold. Democrats have refused to fund ICE and Border Patrol without reforms.
Great article! This really puts things into perspective. I appreciate the thorough research and balanced viewpoint.
Interesting read, though I think there are some points that could have been explored further. Would love to see a follow-up on this topic.
Thanks for sharing this! I had no idea about some of these details. Definitely bookmarking this for future reference.
Well written and informative. The examples provided really help illustrate the main points effectively.
This is exactly what I was looking for! Clear, concise, and very helpful. Keep up the excellent work!