Fury over colonial artwork ‘honouring invasion’ showcased at British Embassy

UK MORNING BRIEFING This morning, the Foreign Office faces backlash over a painting at the British embassy in Nigeria, which depicts the Royal Navy's 1851 attack on Lagos. Calls for its removal intensify due to concerns it celebrates colonial history.

Unknown Author

8 min read
0

/

Fury over colonial artwork ‘honouring invasion’ showcased at British Embassy

Get you up to speed: Fury over colonial artwork ‘honouring invasion’ showcased at British Embassy

FOREIGN OFFICE CONTROVERSY
The Foreign Office faces backlash for displaying James George Philp’s painting of the Royal Navy’s 1851 attack on Lagos at its embassy in Nigeria.
FOREIGN OFFICE CONTROVERSY
Kim Johnson MP has called for transparency regarding the Foreign Office’s decision to display a controversial artwork celebrating the 1851 Royal Navy attack on Lagos.
ARTWORK CONTROVERSY
Calls continue for the removal of the painting at the British Deputy High Commission in Lagos amid concerns over its diplomatic implications.

What we know so far

The Foreign Office has faced backlash for displaying a controversial artwork at the British embassy in Nigeria, depicting the Royal Navy’s 1851 attack on Lagos that resulted in the deposition of the region’s king. Critics have labelled the installation ‘disgusting’, arguing that it celebrates the historical invasion of Nigeria.

Installed by the British Deputy High Commission in Lagos following Labour’s victory in the July 2024 election, the painting, titled ‘British Men of War Attacked by the King of Lagos’, has sparked demands for its removal. Historians and activists assert that it conveys a troubling message of celebration regarding colonisation, while the Foreign Office maintains that its intention is to encourage reflection on Britain’s complex history with Nigeria.

Calls for the painting’s removal have intensified, with figures like Professor Hakim Adi condemning its installation and urging the government to reconsider its choice. Kim Johnson MP has also expressed concern, stating that transparency is needed regarding the decision-making process behind the artwork’s display. Advocates fear that such a provocative display could jeopardise diplomatic relations between Britain and Nigeria.

Responses from historians have been mixed, with some acknowledging the need to reflect on historical events while condemning the lack of context surrounding the artwork. Legacy, a historical preservation group, argued that the artwork could serve as a reminder of historical forces but highlighted the importance of framing it properly within the broader narrative of colonialism.

As the situation develops, the Foreign Office confirmed it hosted a descendant of the Kosoko family to discuss the artwork. The debate over its implications continues, bringing renewed attention to Britain’s colonial legacy and its impact on contemporary relations with African nations.

Read in full

Outrage over colonial painting that ‘celebrates invasion’ displayed at British Embassy | News UK

Philp, James George; British Men o' War Attacked by the King of Lagos; Government Art Collection; http://www.artuk.org/artworks/british-men-o-war-attacked-by-the-king-of-lagos-29032
‘British Men of War Attacked by the King of Lagos’, by James George Philp, displays the Royal Navy’s attack on Lagos (Picture: Government Art Col)

The Foreign Office has been branded ‘disgusting’ for installing an artwork at the British embassy in Nigeria that ‘celebrates’ the country’s invasion.

The British Deputy High Commission in Lagos installed a painting of a Royal Navy attack on the port city in 1851 which toppled the region’s king, WTX can reveal.

Officials took the decision after Labour came to power in July 2024, but are now facing calls to take it down or risk undermining diplomatic relations.

British-Nigerian historians and activists said the artwork gives the impression the government is ‘celebrating’ colonisation and regime change, but the Foreign Office insists it is there to ‘prompt reflection’.

The painting at the centre of the furious row is ‘British Men of War Attacked by the King of Lagos’, by James George Philp.

Sign up for all of the latest stories

High Commission Lagos
Officials put up the painting some time after Labour won the 2024 general election

It depicts the Reduction of Lagos in 1851, when the Royal Navy stormed the city, deposed King Kosoko and replaced him with their ally Akitoye.

Historians have argued the invasion was to stop Kosoko’s involvement in the slave trade, and to protect British economic and political self-interest.

The attack is widely seen as the first step before full British colonisation of Nigeria in 1861.

Hakim Adi, award-winning British-Nigerian historian, said the Foreign Office should be ‘ashamed’ for putting up an artwork that ‘celebrates invasion and regime change at a time when the world needs to condemn such crimes’.

The professor and African affairs scholar told WTX: ‘The fact that it apparently celebrates the crimes of the past speaks volumes and perhaps provides some indication of its continuing attitude towards Nigeria and Nigerians.’

Professor Kehinde Andrews, co-chair of the Black Studies Association, said it was ‘frankly disgusting but not altogether surprising’ that the Foreign Office would display the picture.

He added that it showed a ‘lack of understanding of the horrors of empire’.

Academic and campaigner Toyin Agbetu said it was ‘deeply distasteful’ that officials chose to display an image that ‘celebrates colonial violence against Nigeria’.

professor hakim adi Award winning historian
Award-winning historian Professor Hakim Adi said the artwork ‘celebrates invasion’

The UCL lecturer called on the government to remove the painting.

He added: ‘While the UK is free to display its bad taste on embassy walls, this directly contradicts any stated commitment to building positive, non-racist relationships with African nations that value the so-called Commonwealth.’

Kim Johnson MP said the FCDO should reconsider their ‘deeply concerning’ choice to install the artwork.

She said: ‘We need transparency about who authorised this and why such a choice was made.’

The UK-based African Foundation for Development (AFFORD) agreed with fears that the art could upset vital political ties between Britain and Nigeria.

Onyekachi Wambu, who coordinates AFFORD’s Return of the Icons Programme, said: ‘At a time when Britain has invested considerable effort in strengthening ties, it seems contradictory, even provocative, to display artwork that commemorates a violent episode widely understood as the foundation of colonial domination.’

Britain installed Akitoye into power after bombarding Lagos and established a ‘quasi-protectorate’ over the region, before annexing it totally as a colony in 1861.

The Foreign Office told WTX they hosted a descendant of the Kosoko family after installing James George Philp’s painting at their site.

The motives for the initial British invasion in 1851 that deposed the king has been contested by scholars.

The official explanation at the time was that the British wanted to replace the pro-slave trading king with his rival, who promised to abolish the abhorrent practice.

Destruction of Lagos, on the west coast of Africa, by the British squadron
The Destruction of Lagos, on the west coast of Africa, by the British squadron in 1851 paved the way for British colonialism

However historians – particularly Nigerian scholars – have more recently challenged that view.

J.F.A. Ajayi, one of Nigeria’s most famous historians, argued the British intervened to gain economic control over the region.

One Nigerian museum, the Centre for Memories, told WTX that the Reduction of Lagos was ‘not a neutral or benign episode in Nigerian history’.

The museum’s executive director Iheanyi Igboko added: ‘It represents a moment of violent intervention, political disruption, and the beginning of a trajectory that culminated in colonial rule.

‘To present such an image, particularly within an official diplomatic space, without clear contextualisation risks appearing as a celebration, or at best, an uncritical memorialisation, of imperial force.’

However Nigerian historical preservation group Legacy said it is ‘understandable that a diplomatic mission would seek to acknowledge the history of its past citizens and the naval tenacity displayed during that era.’

They continued: ‘The painting captures the sheer scale of the Royal Navy’s presence a force that was, at the time, instrumental in the difficult and protracted campaign to suppress the transatlantic slave trade along the West African coast.’

‘We do not necessarily view the display as a “celebration” of forced regime change, but rather as a provocative reminder of the forces that shaped modern Lagos.’

Since Labour won the 2024 general election, more than 20 paintings have been installed in the Deputy British High Commission in Lagos. Britain’s High Commission is in Nigeria’s capital of Abuja.

2D21TFC General view of a print of 'Hibiscus and the Rose' by British-Nigerian artist Yinka Shonibare at a Government Art Collection briefing at the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, in Westminster, London, to announce that 'Hibiscus and the Rose' has been commissioned as a limited print edition to be displayed in government buildings and embassies around the world, as the recipient of the Robson Orr TenTen Award.
The inclusion of ‘Hibiscus and the Rose’ by British-Nigerian artist Yinka Shonibare was welcomed by campaigners (Picture: Alamy Stock Photo)

Most of these have highlighted modern works by British-Nigerian artists.

These include Yinka Shonibare’s The Hibiscus and the Rose and Joy Labinjo’s Wash Day.

Other paintings are pictuersque British landscapes, such as Norman Stevens’ Lower Wessex Lane.

Dr. Adebunmi Adeola Akinbo, Publicity Officer at Legacy, said they were ‘ncouraged to see the inclusion of contemporary voices like Yinka Shonibare and Joy Labinjo’.

They added: ‘Shonibare, in particular, is a master at deconstructing colonial identity, and his presence alongside the Philp painting creates a silent, necessary dialogue between the past and the present.’

Six artworks and sculptures have also been removed from the Lagos Deputy High Commission.

These include pieces by legendary Nigerian artists Ben Enwonwu and Justus Akeredolu, which are both on display at the Tate Modern.

The placement of colonial-era photographs has given officials a headache before.

Buckingham Palace was critcised in March after King Charles posed with Caribbean officials at a London reception ‌beneath a portrait of George IV, who profited from slavery.

A FCDO Spokesperson said: ‘The British High Commission residence in Lagos displays a wide range of modern and historical Nigerian art that we actively use to prompt reflection, including on the complexity of our shared history. 

‘As part of this commitment, we hosted a descendant of the Kosoko family and leading Nigerian historians at the residence to discuss the piece by James George Philp and the events depicted.’

Responses

    Sarah Mitchell·

    Great article! This really puts things into perspective. I appreciate the thorough research and balanced viewpoint.

    James Anderson·

    Interesting read, though I think there are some points that could have been explored further. Would love to see a follow-up on this topic.

    Emma Thompson·

    Thanks for sharing this! I had no idea about some of these details. Definitely bookmarking this for future reference.

    Michael Chen·

    Well written and informative. The examples provided really help illustrate the main points effectively.

    Olivia Rodriguez·

    This is exactly what I was looking for! Clear, concise, and very helpful. Keep up the excellent work!

Stay Updated

Get the latest posts delivered right to your inbox.

No spam, unsubscribe at any time.